• A+
  • A-

Updates

Proposed two-child policy is against human rights

Posted on August 31, 2018

To
Hon’ble Members of Parliament
Parliament of India
New Delhi
 
 
Two Child Policy is against National Interest, violates basic tenets of fundamental human rights and our Constitution
 
Respected Sir/ Madam
 
On 13 August 2018, a petition was presented to His Excellency President of India to impose stringent Two Child Policy, reportedly  signed by  125 Members of Parliament, calling upon the government to  take measures to control India’s high population growth rate through the proposed two-child norm.
 
We  at  Advocating  Reproductive  Choices  (ARC)  coalition  are  concerned  with  this  well-intentioned  but  ill- informed initiative that is detrimental to our national interests and development priorities. Please allow us this opportunity to present some evidences to your eminences to indicate why the two-child norm is considered draconian, backward and anti-people.
 
The corelation between India’s demographics and population growth
 
India  has  been  experiencing  a  slowing  down  in  population  growth,  a  decline  in  fertility  rate,  an  increasing average lifespan and an increase in the working age population. National Family Health Survey 4, 2015-16 (NFHS
4) data indicates 24 states in India have already achieved replacement level fertility. In the last decade, India’s total fertility rate (TFR) has gone down from 2.7 to 2.2, which is very close to the desired replacement level fertility at 2.1.  However, five states in northern India: Bihar, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh contribute to 40% of the population and there are huge disparities in total fertility rates at the district level, even within these states. Certain drivers of population growth deserve attention:
 
The population momentum due to large young population being in childbearing years, will account for more  than  70%  of  projected  population  increase.  The  absolute  numbers  will  continue  to  increase substantially even if each couple had only one child. The only way to slow down the momentum is to delay age at marriage, delay the first pregnancy and ensure spacing between births.
The unmet need for contraception is 13%, which contributes 20% of projected population growth. This means that over 30 million married women of reproductive age are not able to access contraception (NFHS-4).
Nearly 10% of the projected population growth can be attributed to  social factors including families having more children than they actually want, to compensate for high infant mortalities, son preference due to patriarchal social norms etc.
 
Experiences from within India indicate that coercive policies have never worked
 
There is no evidence on the effectiveness of two-child norm.   Similar policies in states like Uttar Pradesh and Bihar have failed to bring down the fertility rates to the desired level. On the other hand, there has been a steep rise in sex-selective and unsafe abortions; men have deserted their wives to run for local body elections, and families give up children for adoption. (Buch 2005.) 
It  is  important  to  note  here  that  States  such  as  Kerala,  Andhra  Pradesh  and  Tamil  Nadu  have  experienced significant reduction in fertility rates without any coercive methods. This has been achieved by empowering women and by providing better education and health care facilities.
 
 
 
Global lessons that can inspire us. Let us not fall for the same mistake again.
 
Thanks to the one child policy in China m the country now finds itself in the midst of a population crisis, leading to an imbalanced age structure and sex ratio.  In 2015, China had to roll back this policy.
 
South Korea switched to a pro-natalist policy to increase the TFR from 1.08 to 1.6 by 2020, post experiencing the consequences of an aging population, rising social security and healthcare costs, and a shrinking labour force (Mahmoudi 2017).
 
Sri Lanka could reduce its fertility rate by integrating family planning with maternal and child health programs for  three  decades  and  Bangladesh  by  lowering  infant,  child  and  maternal  mortality  through  immunization, prenatal and post-natal care in villages (Abeykoon 2011), (Risvi 2018).
 
 
Two Child Norm persecutes the marginalised especially women, violates her reproductive rights
 
Imposing a two-child policy will further deprive the poorest, weakest and the most marginalised, especially women. There are evidences of men deserting their families to contest local body elections and children being given-up for adoption. Children are denied of rights and entitlements for no fault of their own. The number of women representatives in local bodies also reduced.
 
Restricting policies lead to a stark increase in sex-selective abortions and female foeticide, given the changing social norms in terms of son meta-preference (desire for a male child). Economic Survey 2017-18 mentions a staggering 21 million ‘unwanted girls’ in India.
 
Failure  to  address  social  norms  that  determine  family  planning  decisions  will  be  a  violation  of  women’s reproductive rights, and cause a further imbalance in the sex ratio. The outcome of the two-child policy in states such as Haryana and Punjab have witnessed highly skewed sex ratios with lesser number of women to men. Consequences include women forced into sex trade, enslavement; physical abuse and eventual abandonment.
 
Two Child Norm violates fundamental human rights and our constitutional provisions
 
India is a signatory to the Program of Actions, International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD,
1994). The Program of Action states that the “aim of family-planning programmes must be to enable couples and  individuals  to  decide  freely  and  responsibly  the  number  and  spacing  of  their  children  and  to  have  the information and means to do so and to ensure informed choices and make available a full range of safe and effective methods. …The principle of informed free choice is essential to the long-term success of family planning programmes. Any form of coercion has no part to play.”
 
India’s  own  National  Population  Policy  (NPP)  has  a  stated  objective  to  “address  the  unmet  needs  for contraception, health care infrastructure, and health personnel, and to provide integrated service delivery for basic reproductive and child health care”. NPP includes a commitment towards “voluntary and informed choice and  consent  of  citizens  while  availing  reproductive health  care  services,  and  continuation  of  the  target-free approach in administering family planning services”.
 
Any coercive norm or measure to curb informed choice and decisions of citizens violate tenets of fundamental human rights. 
 
 
Population Growth is a socio-economic problem; warrants a socio-economic solution
 
The population growth that India has is solely because of lack of education, lack of access to health facilities and high-unmet need for family planning services. Majority of our population is in reproductive age and 30 million married women of reproductive age are not able to access contraception.
 
Women across rural and urban areas would like to have to have only one or maximum two children (NFHS-4, total desired fertility rate is 1.8). When they are already well informed, why not give them an enabling and empowering environment to help realise their choices rather than imposing a policy? Reduction in maternal mortality and infant mortality by ensuring access to affordable and quality health care will automatically reduce population growth.
 
We appeal to the Hon’ble Members of Parliament to consider the inalienable relation between the demographic transition  and  development  of  our  nation.  24  states  in  India  that  have  already  achieved  replacement  level fertility without any coercive methods. The most potent measure that reduces population momentum is to keep girls in schools and raising the age of marriage. This will help empower women with the ability to make positive reproductive choices.
 
We urge you to prioritize the development needs of our citizens, particularly women. Women’s access to family planning services, improved access to quality education, investing in building sexual and reproductive awareness among young people and providing women the opportunity to pursue a livelihood are the winning solutions towards a healthy, balanced population.
 
We believe that there is need for deeper analysis and understanding of the issue and we do hope that this appeal  to  our  Honourable  Members  of  Parliament  will  lead  to  well  informed  and  healthy  debates  around population and reproductive health rights.
Two Child Norm has never worked anywhere. Let us just discard this draconian notion for the last time! Thanking you
In solidarity
 
 
 
About Advocating Reproductive Choices (ARC):
 
Advocating Reproductive Choices (ARC) is a coalition of 165 civil society organisations and individuals that are committed to advocating for greater attention and focus on sexual and reproductive health issues and family planning services in India. Established in 2005, the coalition aims to expand contraceptive choices and call for greater attention to the quality of care of family planning services for the Indian population. ARC is comprised of organisations that  have  technical  ability  and  implementation  expertise  in  reproductive  health and  family planning.
 
ARC makes concerted and sustained advocacy efforts to enhance accessibility and expand contraceptive choices available to all women in India. The ARC Core Committee oversees strategic decisions and plans made by the coalition.  There  are  five  state  chapters  of  ARC  in  Rajasthan,  Uttar  Pradesh,  Madhya  Pradesh,  Bihar  and Jharkhand. In 2005 its first secretariat was with Parivar Seva Sansthan (PSS). In 2007 Family Planning Association of India became the next secretariat. Since, 2015 Population Foundation of India is holding the ARC Secretariat.
 
Visit us at: http://arccoalition.org/